ABT About

What this site will and will not say.

This is free information about mis-sold investments in the UK, written to a fixed set of editorial rules and cited to official sources throughout. The rules matter more than the prose, so they are set out first.

These rules apply to every page on the site, including the guides and the case hubs.
RuleWhat it means in practice
No invented figuresNo compensation estimates, no average payouts, no success rates, no “typical” claim values. The single figure we report as zero is the fee for using the checker, because that figure is true.
No claims about named firms without a published sourceWhere a firm or a fund is named, it is because a regulator, a court or the Ombudsman has published something about it, and the page cites it. Case hubs rest entirely on published material.
Every rule carries a citationLimits and deadlines are quoted from the official source and show the date we read it. If we cannot verify a rule against the official text, the page says so visibly instead of stating it confidently.
Two consents, both refusableReceiving a summary by email and asking us to contact you about your claim are separate choices. Tick neither and the site still works, fully.
Risk stated, not buriedWhere a route can fail or cost money, the page says so on the page, not in a footnote. The Ombudsman’s award limit is described as a ceiling, not a target.
No dark patternsNo countdown timers, no fake scarcity, no pre-ticked boxes, no “your claim is worth £X” teaser, and no exit-intent pop-ups that trap a reader.
Accessibility is a launch requirementKeyboard operable throughout, visible focus states, semantic headings, real tables with headers, and full respect for prefers-reduced-motion.
Corrections are datedWhere we get something wrong we change it and note the change. The “last reviewed” date on each page comes from the same registry that produces the sitemap.

01 How content is produced

Written, reviewed, and dated.

Every long-form page states who wrote it (The mis-sold investment team at Edward & Amaury Solicitors), who reviewed it for legal accuracy ([CONFIRM: name of the solicitor who reviews this content]), and when it was last reviewed (12 October 2026). The review date is stored in the same registry that generates the sitemap, so a page cannot go out with a stale date that disagrees with its own lastmod.

Where a page states a limit, a deadline or a rule, it quotes that rule and names the source. Where a rule could not be checked against the official text, the page carries a visible instruction to confirm it rather than a confident paraphrase — a page with an honest gap is more useful than a page with a confident error.

No compensation figures appear anywhere on the site. Not an average, not a range, not an example presented as typical. A figure depends on the full file and on a comparison that needs documents we have never seen, so producing one would be a guess dressed as information.

// Still to be confirmed

  • [CONFIRM: name of the solicitor who reviews this content]Trust section, every guide byline
  • [CONFIRM: ICO registration number]Footer, /privacy/, /cookies/
  • [CONFIRM: professional indemnity insurer and cover level]/for-solicitors-and-funders/
  • [CONFIRM: opening hours]Footer, /contact/
  • [CONFIRM: GA4 measurement ID or Plausible domain]Consent banner (fires only after consent)

02 Source register

Every source we cite, with the date we read it.

These are the primary sources behind the limits, deadlines and rules quoted across the site. The register is published in full so you can check any of it yourself, which is faster than trusting us.

03 Key rules quoted

The limits and deadlines, verbatim.

fosAwardLimit

£455,000 for complaints referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service on or after 1 April 2026 about acts or omissions that occurred on or after 1 April 2019. For acts or omissions before 1 April 2019, the limit is £205,000 for cases referred on or after 1 April 2026.

fosAwardLimitNote

The Ombudsman can recommend a firm pays more than the limit, but the firm does not have to accept that recommendation.

fosInterest

For complaints referred from 1 January 2026 the Ombudsman typically asks firms to calculate interest using a time-weighted average of the Bank of England base rate plus one percentage point. Before that, the typical rate was 8% simple a year.

fosCost

The Financial Ombudsman Service is free to consumers.

fosSixMonths

You need to contact the Financial Ombudsman Service within 6 months of receiving the firm’s final response, or it may not be able to help.

fcaEightWeeks

Firms must normally give you their final response in writing within 8 weeks of your complaint.

fcaSixYearsThreeYears

You normally need to complain within 6 years of the problem happening or, if later, within 3 years of becoming aware that you had cause to complain.

fscsInvestmentLimit

For an investment firm that failed after 1 April 2019, FSCS can pay up to £85,000 per eligible person, per firm.

fscsOlderLimits

For firms that failed between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2019 the limit is £50,000 per eligible person, per firm.

fscsAdvice

Where a claim is about bad advice, the advice must have been given on or after 28 August 1988.

fscsPerformance

FSCS cannot accept claims that are only about poor investment performance — the value of investments can go down as well as up.

fscsCost

It is free to claim from FSCS.

cmcFeeCap

For financial services claims started on or after 1 March 2022 the FCA caps what a claims management company can charge: 30% of awards up to £1,499 (max £420), 28% at £1,500–£9,999 (max £2,500), 25% at £10,000–£24,999 (max £5,000), 20% at £25,000–£49,999 (max £7,500) and 15% above £50,000 (max £10,000) — all excluding VAT.

cmcFeeCapCourt

The fee cap does not apply if you choose to pursue a claim in court with a claims management company.

cmcProtections

Authorised claims management companies must give you a one-page summary of the key information before you sign, a detailed cost illustration, and a 14-day cooling-off period.

s138d

Under section 138D of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, a contravention by an authorised person of a rule made by the FCA is actionable at the suit of a private person who suffers loss as a result, subject to the defences that apply to actions for breach of statutory duty.

limitation14a

For negligence claims where the facts were not known at the outset, the limitation period is six years from the date the cause of action accrued, or three years from the date of knowledge — whichever expires later.

limitation14b

There is an overriding fifteen-year longstop running from the act or omission alleged to constitute the negligence, which bars the claim even if the three-year knowledge period has not yet started to run.

04 Who runs this site

A firm of solicitors, named and checkable.

This site is published by Edward & Amaury Limited, trading as Edward & Amaury Solicitors. We act for people who were mis-sold investments, which is why the editorial rules below are the ones we would want a client to hold us to.

Legal entity
Edward & Amaury Limited — Registered in England and Wales, company number 12195443
Trading as
Edward & Amaury Solicitors
SRA number
800525
Registered office
Pacific House, Fletcher Way, Parkhouse, Carlisle, CA3 0LJ
Telephone
01228 272 395
The firm’s own site
edwardamaury.co.uk

Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

SRA number 800525

Check this number on the SRA register
  • Free to use: the checker and every page on this site cost nothing, and no payment is ever asked for through it
  • No compensation figures, at any point, anywhere on the site
  • No claims about named firms without a published source
  • Content reviewed 12 October 2026 and maintained by a firm of solicitors
MIS-SOLD INVESTMENT / CLAIM CHECKER