Complain to the adviser
Concentrate on what you were told about regulation and protection, and whether the scheme was suitable at all for someone in your position.
08 UCIS and unregulated schemes
An unregulated collective investment scheme pools money into assets that would not normally be sold to the public — land, lending, property development, renewable energy, storage. The schemes are called unregulated for a reason: the protections that apply to ordinary funds, including FSCS protection, generally do not apply to them.
Short answer
Unregulated collective investment schemes are not authorised in the way ordinary funds are and are generally not FSCS protected. A complaint therefore has to be about how the scheme was promoted or recommended: what you were told about its regulation, its risk and its protection, and whether that matched the rules in force.
Indicators only. Not legal or financial advice. Not a prediction of outcome.
NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABETno one can give what they do not have
01 Is this you?
A claim is worth pursuing when the facts line up. These are the facts that matter most for this product. If three or more describe your situation, the checker is worth five minutes.
02 How it works
Ask, in writing, for the legal structure of the scheme and its regulatory status. Was it an authorised fund, a company, a partnership, or a trust? Was it a scheme that could lawfully be promoted to someone like you? The answers determine everything that follows, and a firm that cannot answer the question clearly is telling you something.
The rules on how investment schemes may be promoted to ordinary investors have been tightened over time. `[CONFIRM: states the current FCA rules on promoting unregulated collective investment schemes; add the FCA page you relied on to the Sources list before publishing.]` What matters for your complaint is the gap between what the material conveyed about regulation and protection, and what was actually true.
UCIS cases typically involve a promoter, an adviser, a platform or SIPP operator, and the scheme operator itself. Each had a different role and a different level of regulatory obligation. Write down who did what, and for which of them you have documentation. A complaint addressed to the wrong firm wastes months.
Where a firm was authorised and gave advice, a complaint to it — and if it fails, FSCS — is a real route. Where nobody involved was authorised for what they did, the practical routes narrow to civil claims against individuals and companies, and those need a solicitor. Check each firm on the FCA Firm Checker.
There are two different pots of money: what the scheme might return through its own assets, and what a complaint might recover. They are not the same, and progress on one does not mean progress on the other. Get a clear view of the scheme’s own position before assuming an award will follow.
03 The clock
04 The routes
Concentrate on what you were told about regulation and protection, and whether the scheme was suitable at all for someone in your position.
Where the scheme sat inside a pension or a platform, the operator’s decision to accept it is a separate question with a separate answer.
Where an authorised firm failed. Investment claims are limited to up to £85,000 per eligible person, per firm for firms that failed after 1 April 2019, and claims that are only about performance cannot be accepted.
Often the only route left where the parties were unregulated. Take advice early on limitation and on funding, and be sceptical of anyone who promises a recovery.
05 Evidence
You do not need everything before you start. But a complaint that names dates, amounts and documents is much harder to answer with a template letter.
06 Questions
It means the scheme is not authorised in the way an ordinary fund is, so the protections built around authorised funds — including FSCS protection and the ombudsman route against the scheme — generally do not apply. It does not mean nobody can be held responsible; it means the responsibilities sit with the people who promoted or recommended it.
Yes, and that statement is central. FSCS publishes what it does and does not cover, and it is clear that some investment products are not protected. The gap between what you were told and what was true is the complaint.
The pension wrapper does not make the investment regulated. It does add a firm — the SIPP operator — whose own decision to accept the asset can be examined separately.
They usually involve more firms, more documents and often a failed underlying asset, and several processes run at once: the scheme’s own position, a complaint against an adviser, and possibly a civil claim. That is a description of the shape of the work, not a promise about any outcome.
No. We do not produce compensation figures anywhere on this site, because a figure needs the full file, the correct comparison, and someone accountable for the calculation. The checker tells you which checks fired, which routes may fit, and what to gather.
Gather the documents, run the checker, and put a written question to the firm that recommended the scheme asking what it told you about regulation and protection. That question alone often reveals more than any research.
Every rule, limit and deadline on this page comes from the official sources below. Each was read on the date shown. Where we could not verify a rule against the official text, we have left a visible instruction to confirm it rather than describing it from memory.
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Checked 12 October 2026 — Investment compensation limits per eligible person per firm, and what FSCS cannot cover.
FSCS compensation rules and eligibility
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Checked 12 October 2026 — The conditions that must all be met before FSCS can pay a claim.
Financial Services Register / FCA Firm Checker
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked 12 October 2026 — The official register used to confirm whether a firm is authorised and what it is permitted to do.
Warning list of unauthorised firms
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked 12 October 2026 — Published warnings about firms and individuals we may need to flag in the checker.
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked 12 October 2026 — The complaint process, the eight-week final response and the six-month window to go to the Ombudsman.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 138D — Actions for damages
legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
Checked 12 October 2026 — The statutory right of a private person to sue for loss caused by a firm’s breach of an FCA rule.
// Next step
Free, private, and no obligation. You get an indicator, the checks that fired, where you are against the deadlines, and the documents to gather.
Canonical: https://mis-sold-investments.com/ucis-unregulated-investment-claims/